Friday, August 20, 2010

Which is morally repugnant: a man having sex with another man, or a man having sex with a teenage girl?

Regardless of your choice (one or the other, both or neither), explain your reasoning.Which is morally repugnant: a man having sex with another man, or a man having sex with a teenage girl?
Both are still bad. A man having sex with a woman he is not married to is aldulteryWhich is morally repugnant: a man having sex with another man, or a man having sex with a teenage girl?
how is a single male and female having sex adultery?

Report Abuse



If neither is done in public and if the participants are all at least over the age of majority, neither act is repugnant.





If the man having sex with the teenage girl is more than 2 years older than the girl and she is underage, most states would say that the man is committing statutory rape, and I find that repugnant.





If either of the two men are underage and the difference is more than 2 years apart, again, that would be repugnant.





Reasoning? What two folks of legal age do to each other is not my business. What an adult does to an underage child is taking undue advantage of a child and that would be where I draw the line.
Depends on the age of the girl and the circumstances of the relationship. If the man has a position of power of the girl, then no matter how young or old she is, it would be wrong - as his using his position and age to pressure her into a relationship. However, if the teenage girl is at or older than the age of consent for where she is, then it is determined that, legally, she is capable of making her own decisions, and if she consents to a relationship with an older man, that is none of my business.





I have no problem with men (or women) of the same sex getting dirty in the sheets.
I had sex with a 14 year old (a cousin actually) but then again I was 11 and she was the one that initiated the action of which I did not have a clue what was happening at the time.





But to answer your question homosexuality is not repugnant, pedophilia is.
Your question is morally repugnant, and so is your attitude towards gay people. I recommend you clear your life of superstitious nonsense and do some social work involving gay people, and you will despise yourself far less than you do now.
A man having sex with a teenage girl. It's disgusting, and teenagers aren't mature enough to know whether or not they really want it. If two grown men have consensual sex, that is their business, and I see nothing wrong with it.
neither.





i think whatever gender someone prefers is thier choice, and i think that if you disagree with their choice you should keep your nose out of thier business.





it depends on thier age.i consider a man 16 + and a teenage girl 13-19.
Well if the teenage girl is of age (whether it be 18, 16 or whatever is legally considered consensual) then neither's wrong. Now if the girl was underage then of course it is wrong.
It would depend on how old the man was and the girl, if the man was like 40 and having sex with a 14 year old, then no of course, but if they are both of consenting age, then it is fine
Since there's nothing wrong with two men having sex if they are married to each other, I would have to say the man having sex with a teenage girl... assuming she is underage... you didn't specify.
The correct and only intelligent answer is- Neither if the sex is consensual, sex is a loving act, so how can it be wrong or morally repugnant, perhaps you could explain the reasoning behind your question??
Consensual sex with two adults is not morally repugnant, taking advantage of a vulnerable teen is.
Neither is repugnant if both partners can give legal consent. I find your insinuation quite repugnant, however.
I don't see why a man would want to have sex with a teenager, but if she made a well-informed, consenting choice then neither is wrong.
with another man because it is the dream of every man to have sex with a teenage girl but not with another man.
Why are you implying there's something wrong with a man having sex with another man? Oh course paedophilia's worse!
False dichotomy. I find neither repugnant if they are consenting adults. I had sex with a 17 year old when I was 22, what's the big deal?
sexual exploitation of minors seems pretty repugnant, regardless of gender.
If the women is of legal age then people should just MYOB.This is also true for men with men.

No comments:

Post a Comment